Kedar Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.75666 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-236 Year-2018 Thana- BOCHAHAN District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Kedar Sahni Son of Late Arun Kishore Sahni, resident of Village- Rudha Sanathi, P.S- Bochaha, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinay Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar - 1, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-01-2019 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Bochaha P.S.Case No. 236 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341,323, 353, 504, 506 and 120 (B) 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner, who happens to be husband of Mukhiya, is that during the meeting of Panchyat Samiti, Mukhiya of Rampur assaulted by chair and abused the informant and putting pressure upon him for posting of Ex-Panchayat Secretary. It is further alleged that the petitioner is an accused in six other cases.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and all the cases has been lodged at the instigation by local M.L.A.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.75666 of 2018(3) dt.25-01-2019 2/2 and he has been falsely been implicated in this case and learned A.P.P. and learned counsel for the informant, who opposes his prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances as discussed above, the case of the petitioner is concerned, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, accordingly, prayer of anticipatory bail is rejected with a direction to the petitioner to surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of order and make prayer for regular bail, the same shall be considered by the learned court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order of this court.

This application is accordingly dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudha/- U T