← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/285/2024dismissed

Pramila Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-29Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.285 of 2024 ====================================================== Pramila Devi Wife of Late Kedar Nath Singh, Resident of VillageBhikhanpura, P.S.- Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar.

2.

The Collector, Muzaffarpur.

3.

The Additional Collector (Public Grievance Redressal Forum), Muzaffarpur. 4.

The Sub-Divisional, Public Grievance Redressal Forum, East Muzaffarpur, Muzaffarpur.

5.

The Circle Officer, Musahari, Muzaffarpur.

6.

The S.H.O., Musahari Police Station, Muzaffarpur. 7.

Sitaram Singh, Son of Late Sukhdeo Singh, Resident of VillageBhikhanpura, P.S.- Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur. 8.

Awadhesh Kumar Singh, Son of Late Anandi Singh, Resident of VillageBhikhanpura, P.S.- Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Om Prakash Srivastav, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Ambastha, SC-26 Mr. Santosh Kumar Mishra, AC to SC-26 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 29-04-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1(i). For a direction to the respondent nos. 5 and 6 to implement and comply the order dated 08.06.2022 passed by the Additional Collector, Public Grievance Redressal Forum, (Respondent no.3) in Exclusive Case No.

514110122102102805/1A dated 02.03.2022 (Annexure: 3) and order dated 07.01.2022 of the Sub-Divisional Public Grievance Redressal

Patna High Court CWJC No.285 of 2024(2) dt.29-04-2024 2/2 Forum (Respondent No.4) in Complaint Case No. 514110122102102805 dated 22.10.2021 (Annexure: 2).

(ii). For a direction to respondent nos. 5 and 6 to organize the Shaniwariye Baithak and to redress the grievance of the petitioner."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U