Lalita Devi @ Mai Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84001 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2025 Thana- GADHA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Lalita Devi @ Mai Ram S/o Vinod Raut Resident of Village- Manik Chowk West, Ward No. 8, P.S.- Garha, Dist.- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Nirmala Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-12-2025 Heard Mr. Aryan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Nirmala Kumari, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Garha P.S. Case No. 49 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 105 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that two accused persons pushed the brother of the informant, who fell down on the road and received an injury on the head and died. It is alleged that the petitioner is the main conspirator.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. She has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that save and except a single line in the FIR that the petitioner is the main

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84001 of 2025(2) dt.12-12-2025 2/2 conspirator, there is nothing against her. From perusal of the order of the learned trial court also, it transpires that during the course of investigation, witnesses have stated that she is the main conspirator, but it is not clear how she had conspired the occurrence and what her role is. Moreover, petitioner is a lady and she is in custody since 01.09.2025 having no criminal antecedent.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Garha P.S. Case No. 49 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T