← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./80090/2019dismissed

Bibi Hasnati @ Hasnati v. The State Of Bihar

2019-12-16Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80090 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2019 Thana- AMAUR District- Purnia ====================================================== Bibi Hasnati @ Hasnati Wife of Tohid Resident of Village - Rani, P.S.- Amour, District - Purnea.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amit Kumar Anand with Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocates For the State :

Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 19-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection with Amour PS Case No. 12 of 2019 dated 17.02.2019 instituted under Sections 341, 323, 324 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is specific of inflicting dabia blow on the sixteen years son of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that she is a lady and though the occurrence is said to have taken place on 05.02.2019, but the FIR was lodged on 17.02.2019. Learned counsel also drew the attention of the Court to a compromise between the parties dated 11.03.2019.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80090 of 2019 dt.19-12-2019 2/2

5. Learned APP submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is specific and the doctor who has prepared the injury report has found wound on him of 8 cm x 2 cm on the head. Thus, learned counsel submitted that the petitioner does not deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail.

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

7. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

8. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the Court below and prays for bail, the same shall be considered on merits, in accordance with law, without being prejudiced by the present order.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Ranjeet/Rahul AFR/NAFR U T