Dr. Nazim Khan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1135 of 2024 ====================================================== Dr. Nazim Khan Son of Md. Ishaque Khan Resident of Pathan Toli, Ward No.- 8, Sitanabad, Police Station- Simari Bakhtairpur, Distt.- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Additional Collector, Saharsa. 2.
The Dy. Collector, Land Reforms Cum S.D.O., Saharsa. 3.
The Circle Officer, Simari, Bakhatiarpur, Saharsa. 4.
Ahtesam Khan alias Ahteramul Hussain Khan Hussain Khan, Son of Late Abdul Razak Khan Resident of Pathan Tolk, Sitanbad, Police StationSimari, Bakhtiarpur, District- Saharsa. 5.
Akhtar Khan alias Kartar Khan, Son of Late Gaffar Khan Resident of Pathan Tolk, Sitanbad, Police Station- Simari, Bakhtiarpur, District- Saharsa. 6.
Sattar Khan, Son Sitale Khan Resident of Pathan Tolk, Sitanbad, Police Station- Simari, Bakhtiarpur, District- Saharsa. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Neeraj Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Vatsal Verma, AC to SC-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 25-04-2024 Heard Mr. Neeraj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Vatsal Verma, AC to SC-4.
2. The present petition has been preferred against the order dated 25.05.2022 passed by the respondent no.1, the Additional Collector, Saharsa in Misc. Case No. 41 of 2000. He has not find any irregularity passed by DCLR cum S.D.O., Saharsa and by which/dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner and order dated 6.12.85 passed by the respondent no.3 in Rent Assignment Case No. 16/83 & 16/83.
Patna High Court CWJC No.1135 of 2024(2) dt.25-04-2024 2/2
3. At the outset, learned AC to SC-4 submits that the petitioner is challenging the order dated 25.05.2022 passed by the Additional Collector, Saharsa as also the order dated 6.12.85 passed by the respondent no.3, the Circle Officer, Bakhatiarpur, Saharsa but the order dated 16.12.85 is not on record.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner after some argument submits that he will be approaching the appropriate authority/Tribunal against the order passed by the Additional Collector, Saharsa.
5. Granting such liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U