← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./85658/2025bail granted

Bipin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-09Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85658 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-253 Year-2025 Thana- DIGHWARA District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Bipin kumar Son of Raju Patwa Resident of Village-Nakati Devi Road, p.s.- Dighwara, Dist- Saran at Chapra 2.

Vivek Kumar son of Late Mahesh Prasad Resident of Village-Nakati Devi Road, p.s.- Dighwara, Dist- Saran at Chapra 3.

Sunil Kumar Patwa son of Raju Patwa Resident of Village-Nakati Devi Road, p.s.- Dighwara, Dist- Saran at Chapra 4.

Vishunu Kumar @ Raja son of Santosh Kumar Pathrwa Resident of VillageNakati Devi Road, p.s.- Dighwara, Dist- Saran at Chapra 5.

Sharda Devi Wife of Lalan Prasad Resident of Village-Nakati Devi Road, p.s.- Dighwara, Dist- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 223, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 118(2), 109, 125(a), 125(b), 324(4), 352, 351(2), 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per prosecution case, dispute between children of both parties led to marpit in which both sides inflicted injuries on each other.

4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that these petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85658 of 2025(2) dt.09-02-2026 2/2 case due to dirty village politics. Dispute between children of both parties led to free fight in which both sides sustained injuries. Case and counter case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that similarly situated co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 07.10.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 68648 of 2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail.

6. Considering the nature of accusation and other facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for bail of all these petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within eight weeks from today, let these petitioners, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate I, Saran at Chapra in Dighwara Police Station Case No. 253 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 of the B.N.S.S.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T