← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./84959/2025allowed

Alok Singh @ Alok Prakash v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-16Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84959 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-465 Year-2025 Thana- MAHARAJGANJ District- Siwan ====================================================== Alok Singh @ Alok Prakash, S/O Deep Narayan Singh, Resident of VillageKapiya Nizamat, P.S.- Maharajganj, Dist.- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Advocte For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Abhay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 465 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 111, 61(2) and 317(5) of the B.N.S., Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and Sections 8, 20(ii)(B) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from the possession of the petitioner, 438 gram of charas like object was recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that nothing has been recovered from his possession. It has also been submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84959 of 2025(2) dt.16-12-2025 2/2 while making the seizure, police has not complied Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. It has also been submitted that in any view of the matter, the contraband which has been recovered from his possession is though more than small quantity but is much less than commercial quantity. He is languishing in judicial custody since 13.09.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail and has submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of five cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Siwan in connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 465 of 2025 with the condition that petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present in the trial Court on each and every date.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T