Uttam Kumar @ Bala Kumar Singh @ Uttam Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84248 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-205 Year-2024 Thana- JAMHOR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Uttam Kumar @ Bala Kumar Singh @ Uttam Kumar Singh S/o Indradeo Singh R/o Village - Chechadi, P.S - Obra, District - Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 15-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Jamhore P.S. Case No. 205 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 338, 336(3), 340(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 25(1-B)(a), 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that from the possession of this petitioner, altogether 500 live cartridges were recovered. He could not show any license document regarding the seized bullets.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that nothing has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84248 of 2025(2) dt.15-12-2025 2/2 recovered from the possession of this petitioner. It has also been submitted that the police have not complied with Section 105 of the BNSS while making the seizure. The witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel. Earlier the petitioner was permitted to withdraw the prayer for bail with a liberty to revise the same after six months. It has been submitted that more than six months have elapsed. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 30.10.2024.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VII, Aurangabad, Bihar in connection with Jamhore P.S. Case No. 205 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T