Abhi Kumar @ Avi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86238 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2025 Thana- MALI District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Abhi Kumar @ Avi Kumar S/o Pintu Singh @ Pintu Kumar Singh R/o Village- Sori, P.S- Mali, Dist- Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 103(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with eight co-accused persons have killed the son of the informant by firing.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the FIR, it is clear that the informant is not the eye witness of this case. It is only his suspicion that the persons named in the FIR have killed his son. Learned counsel for the petitioner has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86238 of 2025(2) dt.17-12-2025 2/2 further submitted from perusal of the postmortem report, it is clear that there was only one ante-mortem injury on the person of the deceased. He has also submitted that similarly situated other co-accused persons have already been granted bail by learned co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 18.11.2025 and 19.11.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 75808 of 2025 and 77952 of 2025. The case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 12.06.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Mali P.S. Case No. 124 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Aurangabad. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Shubham/- U T