Raja Kumar @ Raj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85536 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-400 Year-2025 Thana- VAISHALI District- Vaishali ====================================================== Raja Kumar @ Raj Kumar Son of Vinay Kumar, Resident of Village - Chandi, P.S.- Kajipur, District - Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Yogendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 10-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 400 of 2025 dated 12.06.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 329(4), 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 109 and 303(2) read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner and other co-accused persons came to the shop of the informant and abused and assaulted him as well as his customers. The petitioner opened fire in the shop and took away four mobile phones, rupees thirty thousand cash, ATMs, credit card, PAN card, Voter Id card, Aadhar card and driving license. The occurrence took place in the background of the grievance of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85536 of 2025(2) dt.10-12-2025 2/3 petitioner against the informant, as informant removed the acquaintance of the petitioner from his shop.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The occurrence took place on 12.06.2025, but the seizure list had been prepared on 13.06.2025, which creates doubt over the seizure. Learned counsel next submits that petitioner is having clean antecedent and chargesheet has been submitted. Learned counsel lastly submits that petitioner is in custody since 12.06.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the period of custody of the petitioner, his clean antecedent and submission of chargesheet, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur / concerned Court, in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 400 of 2025, subject to the condition laid down under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S. and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85536 of 2025(2) dt.10-12-2025 3/3 other following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial Court.
(iii) In case of non-appearance of the petitioner on single date or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned.
(Arun Kumar Jha, J) Shahnawaz/- U T