Laxman Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78405 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2019 Thana- VIJAYEPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== LAXMAN MANDAL Son of Saghal Mandal Resident of Village - Mathia, P.s.- Vijaypur, Distt.- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhramveer For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Asha Devi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Vijaypur P.S. Case No. 169 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

Allegation is recovery of 20 litres of country made liquor from the possession of petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and said recovery was made from below the Gumti. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 23.10.2019. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78405 of 2019(2) dt.02-12-2019 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below, in connection with Vijaypur P.S. Case No. 169 of 2019 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T