← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./86541/2025disposed

Anjali Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-06Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86541 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9271 Year-2023 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Anjali Kumari Wife of Late Pankaj Kumar Resident of House No.-128, Rampur, Near Bank of India, Gari Khana, Khagaul, Police Stattion - Khagaul, District - Patna presently Resides as Daughter of Umesh Prasad, Ganga Vishnu Nagar Road No.-3A, Kankarbagh, Police Station -Kankarbagh, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Soni Kumari Daughter of - Late Sheetal Prasad Resident of - House No.- 128, Rampur, Near Bank of India, Gari Khana, Khagaul, Police Stattion Khagaul, District - Patna 3.

Rupa Kumar Wife of - Late Sheetal Prasad Resident of - House No.-128, Rampur, Near Bank of India, Gari Khana, Khagaul, Police Stattion Khagaul, District - Patna 4.

Rajesh Kumar Ranjan Son of Raghubir Singh Resident of Village Arap Near Panchayat Bhawan, Police Station-Arap, District - Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sudhanshu Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 06-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP of the State.

2. The petitioner has filed the present application seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to opposite party nos. 2 to 4 by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-XXXII, Patna vide order dated 15.09.2025 passed in A.B.P. No. 2281 of 2025.

3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86541 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026 2/2 petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present application for cancellation of bail in order to seek his remedy before Court concerned which has granted anticipatory bail to the opposite party nos. 2 to 4 as her main ground for cancellation of bail is suppression of fact and the proper and efficacious course in such circumstances would be to approach the court Concerned which granted bail to the opposite party nos. 2 to 4.

4. With such observation, the present application stands disposed of.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) Harsh/- U T