Md. Naushad Alam @ Bablu v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.75726 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2018 Thana- BHABHUA District- Bhabhua (Kaimur) ====================================================== Md. Naushad Alam @ Bablu Son of Md. Zainul Haque @ Zainul Mian Resident of Village-Shiopur,Police Station-Mohania,Distt.-Kaimur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rajesh Kumar Pathak, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-01-2019 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Bhabua P.S. Case No. 214 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 366 (A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner and other co-accused persons is of kidnapping the minor daughter of the informant.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that in this case, police after investigation has found that there is no legal or cogent evidence to connect with the alleged occurrence and the petitioner has been dragged in this case merely on the basis of suspicion and during investigation, the allegation was not supported the case and the petitioner has no
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.75726 of 2018(3) dt.25-01-2019 2/2 criminal antecedent.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Bhabua P.S. Case No. 214 of 2018 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudha/- U T