← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./84398/2025bail granted

Raseda Begum @ Raseda v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-06Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84398 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2025 Thana- Telta District- Katihar ====================================================== 1.

Raseda Begum @ Raseda W/o- Md. Shamim Resident of Village- Madhepur PS- Balrampur Dist- Katihar 2.

Md. Shamim S/o- Late Md. Suleman Resident of Village- Madhepur PSBalrampur Dist- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Radha Mohan Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-01-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, informant, namely Mukhtar Alam, alleged that his three cows were stolen at night and upon search, he found them loaded in a pickup van at Madhepur village.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. Petitioners have got no concern

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84398 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026 2/3 with the alleged offence and they have falsely been implicated in this case merely because Petitioner No. 1 happens to be registered owner of the pickup van and Petitioner No. 2 happens to be husband of Petitioner No. 1 and driver of the pickup van. No incriminating article has been recovered from conscious possession of these petitioners. As a matter of fact, the stolen cows have already been restored to the informant. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Katihar in connection with Telta P.S. Case No. 35 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84398 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026 3/3 the B.N.S.S..

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T