← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./86582/2025allowed

Jattu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-03Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86582 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-321 Year-2024 Thana- BANKA District- Banka ====================================================== Jattu Yadav, Son of Banarsi Yadav, R/o Village - Chakkadih, P.S.- Banka, District - Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anant Kumar 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Banka P.S. Case No. 321 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352 and 3(5) of B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner has assaulted with kudal on the head of the informant with an intention to kill due to which he received head injury.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is no repetition of blow. The occurrence took place on a spur

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86582 of 2025(3) dt.03-02-2026 2/2 moment of time. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 28.04.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail and has submitted that from perusal of the injury report, it is clear that the nature of injury is grievous.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Banka in connection with Banka P.S. Case No. 321 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T