Sarita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.931 of 2024 ====================================================== Sarita Kumari Wife of Shiv Nandan Kumar Ray, Resident of Naya Tola, Kerwa, Ward No.15, P.O.- Kerwa (Kerma), Kerawan Dih, via-Turki, Muzaffarpur, Bihar, PIN Code - 844127.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

3.

The Circle Officer, Mushahari Circle Office, Muzaffarpur. 4.

The Superintendent of Vigilance Police Station, Patna Vigilance Investigation Bureau, 6-Circular Road, Patna. 5.

The Station House Officer of Vigilance Police Station, Vigilance Investigation Bureau, 6-Circular Road, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Swapnil Kr. Singh, AC to GP-19 for Vigilance :

Mr.Rana Vikram Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 29-04-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1(i) For issuance of a direction to the respondent authority No.5 (the Station House Officer of Vigilance Station, Police Vigilance Investigation Bureau, 6-Circular Road, Patna) for lodging the F.I.R. through the Station House Officer of Vigilance Police Station, Vigilance Investigation Bureau, 6Circular Road, Patna and to the Respondent no.4, (the Superintendent of Vigilance Police Station, Vigilance Investigation Bureau, 6- Circular Road, Patna).

(ii) For issuance of a direction to the respondents

Patna High Court CWJC No.931 of 2024(2) dt.29-04-2024 2/2 concerned to dispose off the respective applications which have been filed before them but have not been considered nor they have been disposed off the representations filed by the petitioner and it is still pending for final adjudication.

(iii) For a direction/directions to the circle officer of Circle Office, Mushahari at Muzaffarpur (Respondent No.3) to accept the mutation case no.16650/2022-23."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U