← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/36/2020disposed

Suman Devi, v. The State Of Bihar

2020-01-24Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.36 of 2020 ====================================================== Suman Devi, Wife of Shri Jitendra Yadav, Resident of Village-Chainpur, nearPrimary School, Chainpur, Police Station-Goriakothi, District-Siwan. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Integrated Child Development Scheme (I.C.D.S.), Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Divisional Commissioner, Saran Division at Chapra. 5.

The District Magistrate, Siwan.

6.

The District Programme Officer, Integrated Child Development Scheme (ICDS), Siwan.

7.

The Child Development Project Officer, Goreyakothi, District-Siwan. 8.

The Lady Supervisor, Goreyakothi, District-Siwan. 9.

The Ward Member of Ward No. 10-cum-the Chairman of Selection of Aanganbadi Sevika, Gram Panchayat Raj Bindwal, Block-Goreyakothi, District-Siwan.

10.

Saroj Devi, Wife of Subhash Kumar Yadav, Resident of Ward No. 9 of Gram Panchayat Raj Bindwal, Block-Goreyakothi, District-Siwan. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s :

Mr.S.K.Mandal (Sc3) Smt. Neelam Kumari, AC to SC 3 Mr. Bipin Kumar, AC to SC-3 Mr. Ravi Ranjan Kumar Singh, AC to SC 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-01-2020 The petitioner has questioned the selection of respondent No.10 as Anganbari Sevika of Ward No.10 of Gram Panchayat Raj Bindwal in the district of Siwan. Petitioner claims that she was also an applicant and respondent No.10 has been selected on the basis of wrong information/incorrect

Patna High Court CWJC No.36 of 2020(2) dt.24-01-2020 2/2 certificate.

It does not appear whether the petitioner has approached the District Programme Officer, Siwan, or not. raising the grievance, which the petitioner has raised in the present writ application. It shall be open to her to approach the District Programme Officer to question the legality of appointment of respondent No.10.

This writ application stands disposed of.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pawan/- U