Jitendra Kumar @ Jitu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84694 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-369 Year-2025 Thana- AKBARPUR District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.

Jitendra Kumar @ Jitu Son of Krishna Prasad Yadav All Are Resident Of Village - Hundrahi, P.S. - Akbarpur, District - Nawada. 2.

Narendra Kumar Yadav Son of Radha Raman Prasad Resident Of Village - Hundrahi, P.S. - Akbarpur, District - Nawada. 3.

Anuj Kumar Yadav Son of Late Jitan Yadav All Are Resident Of Village - Hundrahi, P.S. - Akbarpur, District - Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, A.P.P.

For the Informant :

Mr. Vibhuti Ranjan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118, 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per prosecution case, on 31.07.2025, when informant and his brother were engaged in ploughing the field, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners and 10-15 unknown persons came there and assaulted them with khanti, due to election dispute. It is further alleged that co-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84694 of 2025(5) dt.17-03-2026 2/2 accused Birendra Kumar snatched gold locket.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and there is no allegation of any specific overt act against these petitioners. Injuries sustained by the injured are simple in nature. Case and counter case. Rest of the allegations are ornamental only to make the case grave.

5. Learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application.

6. Considering nature of accusation and injuries, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Nawada in connection with Akbarpur P. S. Case No. 369 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T