← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2996/2019dismissed

Rajesh Ram @ Rajesh Rai v. The State Of Bihar And ANR

2019-03-07Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2996 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-888 Year-2017 Thana- MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== RAJESH RAM @ RAJESH RAI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.The State of Bihar

2. Shila Devi, W/o Rajesh Ram, D/o Vishwanath Ram At present R/O villageKamal Pakari, P.S.- Klyanpur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Santosh Kumar, Mr. Anish Chandra, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-03-2019 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 888/ 2017, corresponding to Trial No. 3913/2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 498 (A) and 406 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner is of demanding of dowry and he along with other accused persons o assaulted the complainant and tortured by different ways and later on, she ousted from her in-laws house and thereafter, the complainant got knowledge that the petitioner made second marriage.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2996 of 2019(3) dt.07-03-2019 2/2 Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has falsely been implicated in this case and he is ready to keep his wife with full dignity and honour and he has no criminal antecedent.

Learned A.P.P. as well as learned counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for bail stating that the petitioner has again married with other girl.

In view of allegation against the petitioner, above named, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected with a direction to the petitioner that if the petitioner surrenders before the Court below and makes prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the learned court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order of this Court. With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed .

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudha/- U T