Parshuram Yadav @ Pashuram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87240 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2025 Thana- SARMERA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Parshuram Yadav @ Pashuram Yadav S/O Late Bala Yadav R/o Vill.- Kumhara, P.S.- Ghoswari, Dist.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Ashok Kumar Kashyap, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that this petitioner, along with co-accused Ghanshyam Yadav, shot in the chest and stomach of son of informant due to which he died at the spot.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case with ulterior motive. Petitioner, having no criminal antecedents, is in custody
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87240 of 2025(2) dt.17-12-2025 2/2 since 04.09.2025.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that he shot the son of informant due to which he died.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation and gravity of offence, the prayer for grant bail of to the petitioner is rejected.
7. However, considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 04.09.2025, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T