Meghu Ram @ Raghu Ram @ Rabu Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78892 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-361 Year-2019 Thana- MUFFASIL District- West Champaran ====================================================== Meghu Ram @ Raghu Ram @ Rabu Ram, aged about 59 years, Male, Son of Late Ramgulam Ram Resident of Village- Chhavani, P.S.- Bettiaha Muffasil, Manuapool, District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar No. 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bettiah Muffasil Manuapool P.S. Case No. 361 of 2019 registered for offences under sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

As per allegation, the police has recovered 12 liters of illicit liquor from the house of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Looking to the quantity of liquor recovered as also the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78892 of 2019(2) dt.11-12-2019 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Excise, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Bettiah Muffasil Manuapool P.S. Case No. 361 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled. It is also made clear that if the petitioner is repeats the similar offence in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of the bail.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T