Dilip Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88647 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-264 Year-2021 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka ====================================================== 1.

Dilip Rai Son of Late Jagdish Rai All are Residents of Village - Gadal, Police Station -Amarpur, District - Banka.

2.

Anirudh Rai @ Anrud Ray Son of Late Mangru Rai R/o Village - Gadal, P.S. - Amarpur, Dist. - Banka.

3.

Jitendra Rai Son of Late Shiv Rai @ Shiv Narayan Ray All are Residents of Village - Gadal, Police Station -Amarpur, District - Banka. 4.

Anita Devi Wife of Nakul Rai All are Residents of Village - Gadal, Police Station -Amarpur, District - Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Md. Nurul Hoda, Advocate For the State :

Md. Fahimuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on 06.06.2021, due to land dispute, all F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, assaulted informant and his family members with lathi, danda, bow, arrow, sword, catapult, bricks and stones due to which, they sustained multiple injuries.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88647 of 2025(3) dt.02-02-2026 2/3

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. Both parties are close relatives and descendants of same ancestors. On alleged date and time of occurrence, on account of long standing land dispute, altercation took place between the parties in which both sides inflicted injuries on each other. There is case and counter-case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against these petitioners.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation and case and counter-case, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Banka in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88647 of 2025(3) dt.02-02-2026 3/3 connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 264 of 2021, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T