Indrajeet Kumar @ Gedda v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84579 of 2025 Arising out of PS. Case No.-351 Year-2025 Thana- BARH District- Patna ====================================================== Indrajeet Kumar @ Gedda, S/o Sri Kant Prasad, R/o Village - Durjanchak, P.S- Sakohara, District - Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Suraj Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ujjwal Shandilya, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s:
Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-12-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 351 of 2025, F.I.R dated 15.06.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 303(2) Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. According to prosecution case, the allegation is that when the informant was selling the vegetable at his ship one person came there and took away informant's money bag and fled on a motorcycle and one of the person, who is 'Poldar' of the market disclosed the name of the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner referring to the contents of the FIR submits that the name of the petitioner does
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84579 of 2025(2) dt.24-12-2025 2/3 not appear in the FIR and the name of the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on account of the fact that he has four criminal antecedents and he is a social worker. It is further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by all the terms and conditions imposed upon him for extending the privilege of anticipatory bail and, in future, if he is found to be involved in such type of activities, the liberty be granted to prosecution to cancel his bail bond.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the allegations are general and omnibus in nature and there is nothing specific against the petitioner. Accordingly, this Court is inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Barh, in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 351 of 2025, subject to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84579 of 2025(2) dt.24-12-2025 3/3 conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and with other following conditions:- (i) one of the bailors should be the family member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official document to show his bona fide;
(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bonds by the Trial Court itself;
(iii) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds; (iv) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Ajit Kumar, J) Vikash/- U T