Dr Ramashankar Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4391 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12414 of 2024 ====================================================== Dr Ramashankar Prasad Son of Late Ramnaresh Prasad Resident of VillageMahadepur, Police Station- Roshna, District- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Sri Mihir Kumar Singh through the Additional Chief Secretary, Panchayati Raj Vibhag, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
Sri Mihir Kumar Singh, through the Additional Chief Secretary, Panchayati Raj Vibhag, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
Sri Govind Choudhary, the Deputy Secretary, Panchayati Raj Vibhag, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4.
Rashmi Singh, the Chairman, Zila Parishad, Katihar. 5.
Sri Amit Kumar, the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Katihar. 6.
Sri Hemant Kumar Singh, the Additional Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Katihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Government Pleader 13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 25-07-2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Opposite Parties and learned counsel for the Zila Parishad are present.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order dated 20.08.2024 passed in C.W.J.C. No.12414 of 2024 has not been complied as there was specific direction that the letter contained in Memo No.732 dated 24.07.2024 be stayed and joining of the petitioner be accepted.
3. Learned counsel for the Opposite Parties submits that in paragraph 8 & 9 of the show-cause filed by the Zila Parishad, it has been categorically mentioned that the joining of the petitioner has been accepted in respect of order passed by this Hon'ble Court. As such, the said order
Patna High Court MJC No.4391 of 2024(3) dt.25-07-2025 2/2 dated 20.08.2024 passed in C.W.J.C. No.12414 of 2024 has already been duly complied with.
4. In the light of the submissions made by the opposite party that keeping the said letter stayed, the joining of the petitioner has been accepted.
5. In this view of the matter, this Court finds that the opposite party is not under contempt, and hence, the present M.J.C. stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U