Patna High CourtCR. MISC./86182/2025bail rejected

Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-20Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86182 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1636 Year-2024 Thana- PHULWARISHARIF District- Patna ====================================================== Manish Kumar S/o Vidhya Nand Prasad R/o Village - Daulatpur, P.S - Bihta, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-01-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Phulwarisharif P.S. Case No. 1636 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 303(2) of the BNS, 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of two cases and the informant alleges that on 22.10.2024 at 03:00 PM his motorcycle was stolen by unknown criminals.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR was against unknown and the name of the petitioner transpired during the course of investigation.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application and submits that from perusal of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86182 of 2025(2) dt.20-01-2026 2/2 the order impugned, it would manifest that the same records that petitioner was caught red handed with liquor on stolen motorcycle of the instant informant. It is next submitted that petitioner has antecedent of two cases and in the event if privilege of anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner, he may abscond. It is also submitted that it appears that petitioner indulges in committing loot of motorcycle for the purposes of indulging in liquor trade.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned APP for the State, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands rejected.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T