Pramod Thakur @ Pramod Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84877 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-111 Year-2021 Thana- KUDHNI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Pramod Thakur @ Pramod Sharma, S/o Sri Ramdayal Thakur, Resident of Ladaura, P.S.- Turki, Dist.- Muzaffarpur, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 15-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Kudhani P.S. Case No. 111 of 2021 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 342, 406, 420, 467, 468, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the husband of the informant was taken away by the petitioner and others to the house of Ramesh Mandal and there Registrar was called and a sale deed was executed in favour of Krishna Murari, wife of Ganga Prasad.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84877 of 2025(2) dt.15-12-2025 2/2 case. He is not the beneficiary of the sale deed nor even witness. It has been submitted that only allegation that he along with others has taken the husband of the informant to the house of Ramesh Mandal. The nature of allegation is general and omnibus. It has also been submitted that the deed was executed properly and he is not concerned in any way with that deed. He is languishing in judicial custody since 12.10.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.1st (West) Muzaffarpur in connection with Kudhani P.S. Case No. 111 of 2021.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T