Ramanand Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9129 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-454 Year-2018 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ramanand Ram S/o Ram Prasad Ram village-Bhagawanpur, P.S.-Kundwa Chainpur, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhannjay Kumar No 2 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Ataur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Excise Case No. 454 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is recovery of 80 litres of Nepali wine from the bag of petitioner while he was coming from Nepal and apprehended by SSB.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing was recovered from his possession and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 17.09.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9129 of 2019(3) dt.18-02-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, East Champaran cum Special Judge, Excise, East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Excise Case No. 454 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T