Musa Quraishi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82186 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-144 Year-2019 Thana- CHENARI District- Rohtas ====================================================== Musa Quraishi Son of Safi Quraishi Resident of Village - Khurmabad, P.S.- Chenari, Distt - Rohtas ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr.Ashok Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party :
Mr.Binod Kumar, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the specific allegation of assault on the informant is against other accused persons. The incident arose due to a trivial issue and petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Four similarly situated co-accused have already been allowed pre-arrest bail by a different bench of this Court vide order dated 18.11.2019, passed in Cr.Mis.No. 71013 of 2019.
In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest/surrender within six weeks from today, let the petitioner, mentioned above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Rohtas at Sasaram in Chenari Police Station Case No. 144 of 2019, on the following conditions:-
(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82186 of 2019(2) dt.11-12-2019 2/2 and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T