Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85229 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-488 Year-2025 Thana- FATEHPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== Vikash Kumar, Son of Sri Sarjun Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village - Manjhauli, P.S. - Fatehpur, District - Gaya Ji(Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rabia Gulnaz, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 488 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 309(6) of the B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that unknown miscreants have taken away the bike, Rs. 10,000/- and a mobile of the informant. After the occurrence, police apprehended the accused Manish Kumar, Nayan Kumar, Raushan Kumar and Sanoj Kumar.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Name of this petitioner not there in the F.I.R. neither he was apprehended by the police. His name has surfaced during investigation in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85229 of 2025(2) dt.16-12-2025 2/2 confessional statement of co-accused Manish Kumar and Nayan Kumar. It has also been submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. There is nothing to show that any recovery was made from the possession of this petitioner. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent he is languishing in judicial custody since 02.07.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail and has submitted that from perusal of the order of the learned trial Court, it transpires that the learned trial Court has recorded that the witnesses have also stated that the accused/petitioner is involved in this occurrence.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M, Gayaji in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 488 of 2025. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T