← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./89426/2024bail granted

Ranveer Das v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-10Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89426 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2024 Thana- Excise Mashrakh District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Ranveer Das S/o Indrasen Das R/o Village- Moikari Dih, Ward No.7, Hathauri Kothi, P.S.- Hayaghat, District- Darbhanga 2.

Rahul Yadav S/o Shambhu Yadav R/o Village- Dhobopur Bansara, Ward No.16, Hathauri Kothi, P.S.- Hayaghat, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nachiketa Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akbar Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 10-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Mashrakh Excise PS Case No. 86 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that total 104.76 litres of foreign liquor was recovered from XUV Car. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners sre innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89426 of 2024(2) dt.10-01-2025 2/2 submitted that petitioner no. 1 is the driver and petitioner no. 2 is the co-driver of the vehicle and they have no knowledge regarding the nature of goods kept in the vehicle. The petitioners are in custody since 03.11.2024 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedent of the petitioners and the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7.

Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Mashrakh Excise PS Case No. 86 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Ranjan/- U T