Patna High CourtCR. MISC./86643/2025rejected

Ujjwal Kumar Giri @ Ujjwal Kumar @ Ujjwal Gori v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-30Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86643 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-348 Year-2023 Thana- PARSA District- Saran ====================================================== Ujjwal Kumar Giri @ Ujjwal Kumar @ Ujjwal Gori Son of Raj Kumar Giri Resident of Village - Khojauli, Police Station - Derni, District - Saran at Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Avinash Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-03-2026 Heard Mr.Avinash Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 27.08.2024 in connection with Parsa P.S. Case No. 348 of 2023, F.I.R. dated 20.10.2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of IPC.

3. As per FIR, allegation against the petitioner is that he alongwith other accused persons of this case surrounded the son of informant and killed him by knife and rod and crushed his head by assaulting with brick.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86643 of 2025(3) dt.30-03-2026 2/3 petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. Further submits that from a bare perusal of the FIR it appears that there is no specific allegation of any assault or overt-act attributed against the petitioner rather there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons including the petitioner.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the confessional statement of co-accused person, namely, Shambhu Manjhi @ Rawan was recorded in paragraph-19 of the case diary in which he has stated that the petitioner has assaulted to the deceased by means of iron rod and co-accused person, namely, Ravi Girio has assaulted to the deceased by means of knife and the same was supported by the medical evidence (postmortem report), apart from the aforesaid, the cloth which was used at the time of occurrence, was recovered from the house of co-accused person, namely, Shambhu Manjhi @ Rawan.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts, confessional statement of co-accused person which is supported by the medical evidence as well as the recovery, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Parsa P.S. Case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86643 of 2025(3) dt.30-03-2026 3/3 No. 348 of 2023, pending in the court of learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Saran at Chapra.

7. Prayer is refused.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T