Patna High CourtCR. MISC./819/2025bail granted

Md. Imran Khan @ Md. Imran @ Kalu v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-24Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.819 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2024 Thana- KAMTAUL District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Md. Imran Khan @ Md. Imran @ Kalu Son of Md. Nazir Khan Resident of Village- Mohammadpur, P.S.- Kamtaul, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Baidyanath Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-01-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had moved earlier seeking regular bail by filing Cr. Misc. No. 49533 of 2024 and the same was permitted to be withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that charges against the petitioner have been framed on 26.11.2024 (Annexure-3).

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.819 of 2025(2) dt.24-01-2025 2/2

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Kamtaul P.S. Case No. 08 of 2024.

7. However, it is mace clear that if the learned trial court comes to a conclusion that petitioner, after his release on bail, is trying to delay the trial of the case in any manner, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T