← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./84926/2025allowed

Mithilesh Kumar @ Mithlesh Kumar Swarankar @ Maithilesh Sonar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-16Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84926 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-196 Year-2025 Thana- KORHA District- Katihar ====================================================== Mithilesh Kumar @ Mithlesh Kumar Swarankar @ Maithilesh Sonar, S/O Nandlal Prasad Sah, R/O Musapur, P.S- Korha, Distt- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Korha P.S. Case No. 196 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 310(4), 310(5) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the police had received a secret information that some miscreants armed with weapon are planning to commit some offence. Police reached there. It is further case of the prosecution is that five persons were apprehended while two persons managed to escape. It is alleged that petitioner is one amongst them who managed to flee away.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84926 of 2025(2) dt.16-12-2025 2/2 petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. His name was disclosed by the apprehended persons. No recovery has been made from his possession. Save and except the statement of co-accused, there is nothing against him. He is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 20.08.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Katihar in connection with Korha P.S. Case No. 196 of 2025. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T