Ram Babu Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79201 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-424 Year-2019 Thana- MINAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Ram Babu Sahani, aged about 41 years, Gender (Male), Son of Pardesh Sahani Resident of Village - Kobhma Chhitarpatti, P.S.- Minapur (Panapur O.P.), Distt.- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashi Bhushan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Minapur P.S. Case No. 424 of 2019 registered for offences under sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a)38/41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

As per allegation, the police has recovered 5 liters illegal Deshi Mahua liquor from behind the house of the petitioner which was hidden in plastic gallon. Looking to the quantity of liquor recovered as also considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79201 of 2019(2) dt.11-12-2019 2/2 surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Excise Act, Muzaffarpur in connection with Minapur P.S. Case No. 424 of 2019 (G.R. No. 1498 of 2019), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled. It is also made clear that if the petitioner is repeats the similar offence in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of the bail.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T