Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84548 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-149 Year-2025 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Yadav S/O Nandan Yadav R/O - Village - Gyantol,P.S- Sahebpur Kamal, District - Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur with Mrs. Vaishnavi Singh Mr. Ritwik Thakur and Mr. Purushottam Kumar.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Yogendra Kumar, APP Mr. Md. Fazli Karim, Adv.for Informant ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offence under Sections 140(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act and later on, Sections 103(1) & 238 of the B.N.S., 2023 were added.
3. It is alleged that on the order of co-accused Sita Devi and Rani Devi, co-accused Dabloo Yadav, Ticker Yadav, Gaurav Yadav, Raushan Yadav (petitioner), Parshuram Yadav and Uma Yadav took out pistol from their waist and started indiscriminate firing. All of them assaulted son of informant with butt of pistol, due to which, he sustained several injuries and thereafter, all the accused persons took him and fled towards Gyantol. Subsequently, the dead-body of informant's son was found covered in sand in Diyara area of Ganga river.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84548 of 2025(2) dt.04-12-2025 2/2
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per F.I.R., this petitioner and other five named accused persons are alleged to have fired and assaulted son of informant with butt of pistol, but in the post-mortem report, only one injury has been found on the person of deceased caused by hard & blunt substance. Thus, F.I.R. stands contradicted by the post-mortem report. Petitioner is in custody since 01.08.2025. Chargesheet has been submitted.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as period of custody, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. - IV, Begusarai in connection with Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No. 149 of 2025. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T