Patna High CourtCR. MISC./85991/2025rejected

Bhulai Mian v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-30Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85991 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-226 Year-2025 Thana- BAGHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Bhulai Mian S/O Late Sadik Mian R/O Village - Malpurwa, Police Station Bagaha, District West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kr Singh No. 1, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-03-2026 Heard Mr. Vijay Kr Singh No. 1, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 15.08.2025 in connection with Bagaha P.S. Case No. 226 of 2025, FIR dated 14.08.2025 registered for the offence under Section 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.

3. According to the prosecution case, it is alleged that informant was informed by daughter-in-law of his brother, Shyamsundar Kushwaha that her father-in-law has been killed. On this, when the informant went to the house of his brother, he found dead body of his brother with injuries on his head. The informant alleged that some unknown persons by means of sharp weapon killed his brother.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85991 of 2025(3) dt.30-03-2026 2/2

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name transpired on the basis of confessional statement of one Mahima Kumari and he is rotting in judicial custody since 15.08.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State, on the other hand, havs vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that petitioner has confessed his guilt in the present occurrence and on the basis of his confessional statement, one knife and clothes of co-accused was recovered from the possession of the petitioner and apart from that petitioner carries two criminal antecedents in which he is on bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st Bagaha, West Champaran pending in the Court of Bagaha P.S. Case No. 226 of 2025,

7. Prayer is refused.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Suruchi/- U T