← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/24483/2018disposed

Kusum Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2019-05-29Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.24483 of 2018 ====================================================== Kusum Kumari W/o Shree Santosh Kumar Resident of Village-Govindpur, P.S. Govindpur, District-Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal secretary, Social Welfare, Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, ICIDS, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Collector, Nawada.

4.

The District Programme Officer, Nawada.

5.

The Child Development Project Officer, Govindpur, District-Nawada. 6.

Soni Kumari Sinha W/o Ritesh Kumar, Resident of Village-Govindpur, P.S.- Govindpur, District-Govindpur, District-Nawada. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava For the Respondent/s :

Mr.K.K.Singh, AC to SC 10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 29-05-2019 Matter has been listed today in the summer vacations as learned counsel for the petitioner was desirous for consideration of his case during vacation.

The slip for listing was filed pursuant to notice dated 08th May, 2019, published prior to the vacation. The matter is, accordingly, taken up for consideration as both parties are present and willing to assist the court for disposal of the matter.

Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the respondents-State.

Patna High Court CWJC No.24483 of 2018(2) dt.29-05-2019 2/2 Counsel for the petitioner submits that representation/ complaint dated 20.11.2018 (Annexure 7) which has been filed before District Programme Officer, Nawada may be disposed off by the authority.

Complaint has been made alleging irregularity in the matter of selection of Anganbari sevika.

In view of limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner and since decision has to be taken by respondent no.4, parties are in agreement that writ petition need not be kept pending.

Respondent no.4 (District Programme Officer, Nawada) is directed to take final decision on representation/ complaint dated 20.11.2018 (Annexure 7) after hearing the parties concerned in accordance with law expeditiously and without undue delay.

Writ petition is disposed off.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) s.hassan/- U