← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./154/2026bail granted

Sonam Devi @ Sonam Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-09Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.154 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-134 Year-2025 Thana- CHAND District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Sonam Devi @ Sonam Kumari Son of Suryadip Kumar R/o Village - Kuddi, PO - Kuddi, PS - Chand, District - Kaimur(Bhabhua), State - Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Tarkeshwar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Aslam Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chand P.S. Case No. 134 of 2025 registered for the offence under Section 103 of the BNS.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant of this case is the father of the deceased who has alleged that the mother of the deceased has killed him. He further alleges that earlier also, the petitioner has killed the child.

4. The petitioner is in custody since 26.05.2025.

5. Considering fact that the petitioner is the mother of the deceased and her period of custody, this application is allowed.

6. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.154 of 2026(5) dt.09-04-2026 2/2 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court below in connection with Chand P.S. Case No. 134 of 2025.

7. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U