← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2721/2019withdrawn

Chandan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2019-11-27The Chief Justice -2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2721 of 2019 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23561 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-209 Year-2011 Thana- BARAUNI District- Begusarai ====================================================== Chandan Singh Arun Singh Resident of Village-Chakballi, P.S-Barauni (Refinery), District-Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Thakur, Adv.

Md. Imteyaz Ahmad, Adv.

Mrs. Babita Kumari, Adv.

Mr. Rituraj Paswan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajit Kumar, APP For the Informant Mr. Prabha Narayan Sharma, Adv. Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, Adv.

Mr. Bimal Kumar No.2, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 27-11-2019 This is an application for bail on behalf of the above named petitioner who has been made accused in connection with Barauni (Refinery) P.S. Case No.209 of 2011 dated 25.8.2011 for the alleged offence under Sections-147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 302 and 337 of I.P.C. and 27 of the Arms Act. Learned A.P.P. states that prosecution witnesses have been examined and insofar as trial is concerned, the stage is that of recording the statement of the accused. Learned counsel for the complainant, against whom cross-case also stands registered and trial is in progress,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2721 of 2019(10) dt.27-11-2019 2/2 states that his clients would fully cooperate during trial and not take any unnecessary adjournment.

Statement accepted and taken on record.

If the Court were to find such statement to have been flouted in any manner, it would be open for the Court to not only take appropriate action in accordance with law, but also examine the possibility of cancelling the privilege of bail granted to the said accused.

In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present application. The application is dismissed as not pressed.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) K.C.Jha/- U