← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4690/2024allowed

Lakshman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-02-09Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4690 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-419 Year-2023 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Lakshman Kumar S/o - Umdanand Bajpai RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KAILASH NAGAR BEHIND CANARA BANK PS KABIYA, DIST LAKHISARAI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 09-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Lakhisarai (Kabaiya) P.S. Case No.419 of 2023, registered for the offence punishable u/s 25(1-B)A, 26, 35 of the Arms Act. 3.

Allegedly, one person was apprehended by the police and from his possession, one country made pistol was recovered and he disclosed that the said pistol belongs to the petitioner. 4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. He has not been apprehended on the spot and his name transpired in this case on the statement of the apprehended co-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4690 of 2024(2) dt.09-02-2024 2/2 accused. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has no concern with the said country made pistol. Petitioner has two criminal antecedent, out of which, one is of similar nature of offence.

5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and considering that the petitioner has one criminal antecedent in similar nature of offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected.

7.

This application is accordingly dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T