Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85776 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2025 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Manish Kumar S/O Ramsundar Mahato Resident of Village- Daniyalpur Anand Nagar Teghra, Ward No.- 6, P.S- Teghra, District- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Amar Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-01-2026 Heard learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 49 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The allegation against the petitioner is of causing assault to the informant by means of iron rod over the head of the informant, leading to serious injuries, besides the allegation against other co-accused persons of causing assault and snatching the valuables.
4. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85776 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026 2/3 petitioner referring to the FIR contended that besides previous enmity between the parties, there is a counter version of the present case being Teghra P.S. Case No. 50 of 2025, instituted by the mother of the petitioner against the informant and others. In the said incidence, the petitioner has also sustained injuries, which have been duly explained in paragraph no. 19 of the bail application. It is further contended that so far the injury which is allegedly attributed to the petitioner is concerned, the same has been found to be simple in nature. To support to the aforesaid contention, the injury report has been placed on record as Annexure 3 to the application. Both the parties are agnates and the petitioner is a student of LLB having fair antecedent, undertakes before this Court that he will fully cooperate in the proceeding of the Court.
5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State vehemently opposed the pre-arrest bail application and submits that because of the assault being made by the petitioner, the informant has sustained serious injury over the vital part of the body.
6. Having considered the submissions set forth by learned Advocate for the respective parties and taking note of the factum of case and counter case, coupled with the simple
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85776 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026 3/3 nature of injuries, besides the fact the petitioner is a student having fair antecedent, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 49 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.
(Harish Kumar, J) supratim/- U T