M/S Aryan Enterprises v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20811 of 2025 ====================================================== M/s Aryan Enterprises through its Proprietor namely Manu Kumar Mishra, male aged about 35 years S/o Narsingh Mishra having its registered office at Malahi, Near Durga Mandir Malahi, East Champaran, Bihar (845425). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Urban Development Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Secretary, Urban Development Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Motihari Municipal Corporation, through its Municipal Commissioner, Motihari, East Champaran.

4.

The Chief Engineer, North (Sub-Division), Urban Development Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

The Superintending Engineer, Urban Development, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.

6.

The Executive Engineer, Urban Development Division, Motihari. 7.

The Assistant Engineer, Urban Development Division, Motihari. 8.

M/s Balaji Infra, through its Proprietor, Binita Jaiswal having its registered office- C/o o Vivek Kumar, Henry Bazar, Nakched Tola, Ward No.-04, Motihari- East Champaran, Bihar 845401.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nilanjan Chatterjee, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Saroj Kumar Sharma, AC to AAG-3 For the Resp. No. 8 :

Mr. Awnish Kumar, Advocate.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH) 06-07-2026 Learned counsel for the Respondent No. 8 submits that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the work order pursuant to NIT No. 16/2024-25 has already been issued in favour of Respondent No. 8 and that the work is almost

Patna High Court CWJC No.20811 of 2025(2) dt.06-07-2026 2/2 complete. It is, therefore, contended that the present writ petition has become infructuous.

2. In view of the aforesaid submission, the present writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.

3. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sudhir Singh, J) (Ranjan Kumar Jha, J) Sujit/- U