Santu Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 79832 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-537 Year-2019 Thana- DIGHA District- Patna ====================================================== SANTU KUMAR RAM Son of Shri Lalan Ram Resident of Village - Tajpur, P.S.- Maner, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is languishing in custody for the offences punishable under Sections 356/379 of the Indian Penal Code.

According to FIR, three persons on a bike snatched mobile phone of the informant. After snatching the mobile phone the bikers were moving fast on their bike and they dashed against a four-wheeler and fell down. This led to apprehension of the petitioner and others. The petitioner has stated on oath that he has got no criminal antecedent. There is no material to substantiate that the petitioner is going to tamper with the evidence or abscond the process of law.

Considering the entire facts, let the petitioner, above

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 79832 of 2019(3) dt.14-01-2020 2/2 named, be released on bail after framing of the charge on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with Digha P.S. Case No.537 of 2019, with following conditions:

(a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

(b) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

(c) The petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the Court.

The trial Court is directed to expedite framing of the charge.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T