Raj Narayan Yadav@ Ram Narayan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2988 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-135 Year-2021 Thana- GHOGHARDIHA District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Raj Narayan Yadav@ Ram Narayan Yadav, 2.

Pappu Yadav @ Pappu Kumar 3.

Pankaj Yadav @ Pankaj Kumar Yadav @ Pankaj Kumar All are S/o Late Baidhnath Yadav, R/o Village-Bholirahi, P.S.- Ghoghardiha, Distt.- Madhubani ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 12-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The accused/petitioners are named in the FIR and apprehending their arrest in connection with Ghoghardiha P.S. Case No.135 of 2021 registered under Sections 448, 341, 323, 308, 354, 379, 504 and 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioners is to assault the informant and other family members, where during the occurrence, they received injuries. The occurrence is alleged to be arising out of previous enmity/land dispute.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2988 of 2025(2) dt.12-02-2025 2/3

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the allegation against the petitioners are general and omnibus and they were not participated in physical assault. While concluding argument, it is submitted that petitioner nos. 1 and 3 were found involved in three more criminal cases and petitioner no.2 was found involved in two more criminal cases and all such cases were lodged by informant and his family members on different counts, where reason behind the occurrence is the land dispute.

5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by taking note of fact as the allegation against the petitioners appears very much general and omnibus qua physical assault accordingly, the petitioners, above-named, are directed to be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Ghoghardiha P.S. Case No.135

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2988 of 2025(2) dt.12-02-2025 3/3 of 2021 corresponding to G.R. No.1823 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS and with further condition:- (i) That petitioners shall not indulge in similar nature of cases till the conclusion of trial, failing which the State shall be at liberty to move before the Trial Court itself for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioners. (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.) Sanjeet/- U T