Navin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.78899 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-68 Year-2018 Thana- PANJWARA District- Banka ====================================================== Navin Kumar Son of Krishna Mihan Bhagat Resident of Village - Sabalpur, P.S.- Panjwara, District- Banka ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Md. Nurul Hoda For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-01-2019 Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Panjwara P.S. Case No. 68 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 353, 354, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the accused persons, including the petitioner is that they thrashed one lady Urmila Devi on the ground and assaulted her and thereafter police personnel came and accused persons fled away.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence and he has falsely been implicated in this case and he is working in Shipping Corporation of India.
Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides and in the facts and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.78899 of 2018(2) dt.11-01-2019 2/2 circumstances, let petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the receipt of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Banka, in connection with Panjwara P.S. Case No. 68 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of the court concerned and further condition is that petitioner has to co-operate in investigation, otherwise his bail bond shall be cancelled.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T