Patna High CourtCR. MISC./85576/2025bail rejected

Manikant Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-09Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85576 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-74 Year-2025 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== MANIKANT YADAV S/o- Sanjay Yadav R/v- Matthrahi Ps- Baheri DistDarbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 103(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that this petitioner shot in the chest and eye of son of informant due to which he died at the spot.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case with ulterior motive. Moreover, charge-sheet has already been submitted and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85576 of 2025(2) dt.09-12-2025 2/2 petitioner is in custody since 27.02.2025.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that he shot the son of informant due to which he died. It is further submitted that on the confession of this petitioner, the pistol which was used in commission of the offence was also recovered. Petitioner has got one criminal antecedent.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation, criminal antecedent of the petitioner and gravity of offence, the prayer for grant bail of to the petitioner is rejected.

7. However, considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 27.02.2025, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T