← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/218/2024disposed

Krishna Das v. The State Of Bihar

2024-02-15Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.218 of 2024 ====================================================== Krishna Das Son of Late Jagdish Das, Resident of Village and P.O.- Gowasa, P.S.- Narhat, District- Nawada (Bihar), Pin- 805122. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Urban Development, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Commissioner, Magadh Range, Gaya.

4.

The District Magistrate, Nawada.

5.

The District Development Commissioner, Nawada. 6.

The Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Nawada. 7.

The Assistant, Nagar Parishad, Nawada.

8.

The City Manager, Nagar Parishad, Nawada.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kunal Tiwary, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mrs.Archana Minakshee, GP-6 Mr.Neeraj Kr. Singh, Adv.

Mr.Upendra Kr. Singh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 15-02-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1.i. For issuance of appropriate writ or writs/order or orders/direction or directions in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the Respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for his appointment on Compassionate ground to appoint him to earliest fixing a reasonable time frame on appropriate post as the father of the petitioner although died on 09.10.2020.

Patna High Court CWJC No.218 of 2024(2) dt.15-02-2024 2/2 ii. For issuance of appropriate declaration that the action of the respondents concerned in not appointing the petitioner on a suitable post under Compassionate ground in question is highly illegal, arbitrary, malicious and tentamounting to violation of the Fundamental Rights, Human Rights and Natural Rights of the petitioner in the facts and circumstances of the case."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the respondents no.6 to 8, i.e. the authorities of the Nagar Parishad, Nawada, has submitted, by referring to paragraph no.6 of the counter affidavit filed in the present case, that the grievances of the petitioner has been fulfilled, inasmuch as he has already been appointed as a Cleanliness Jamadar (Safai Jamadar), vide letter dated 10.01.2024.

3. In view of the aforesaid, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that if that be the case, the present writ petition be disposed off.

4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U