Ayub Khan @ Saddam Khan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86857 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-85 Year-2025 Thana- KANGLI District- West Champaran ====================================================== Ayub Khan @ Saddam Khan S/o Rahmat Khan R/o Village - Raxaul, P.S - Raxaul, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Md. Shah Nawaz Ali For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Parmanand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Kangli P. S. Case No. 85 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(1), 115(1), 318(1), 316(2), 338, 336(3), 329(4), 340(2), 303(2), 351(2) and 3(5) of BNS.
3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that the accused persons stole the cheque book and passbook from the house of the informant and on the basis of forged signature of informant, they illegally withdrew Rs. 4,10,378/- (Rupees Four Lakh Ten Thousand Three Hundred Seventy-Eight) from his bank account. It is further alleged that upon making inquiries, the accused persons including the petitioners forcibly entered into the house at night and assaulted the informant.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86857 of 2025(2) dt.18-12-2025 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is quite innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case due to previous enmity. No such occurrence, as alleged in the FIR, took place, and the case has been registered only with an intention to extort money from his family members. Learned counsel further submits that in the instant FIR, neither the cheque number has been mentioned nor any bank officials has been made accused in this case and without involvement of bank officials, no cheating is possible by anyone. It is stated in para 3 of the bail application that petitioner has clean antecedent.
5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and considering the clean antecedent of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production a copy of this order, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah in connection with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86857 of 2025(2) dt.18-12-2025 3/3 Kangli P. S. Case No. 85 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS.
(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Ankit Kumar/- U T