Patna High CourtCR. MISC./89346/2024bail granted

Jay Jay Ram Singh @ Balkhandi @ Jay Jay Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-03Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89346 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-460 Year-2024 Thana- BEGUSARAI TOWN District- Begusarai ====================================================== Jay Jay Ram Singh @ Balkhandi @ Jay Jay Ram Singh Son of Late Ram Swaroop Singh Resident of Village - Ramdiri, Ward No. 8 Lavar Chak, P.S. - Matihani, District - Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Murli Dhar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 03-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 460 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per prosecution case, the police has recovered one country-made pistol, 15 live cartridges, 02 magazine, one Samsung mobile etc. from the motorcycle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged against him and has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that no arms and ammunition have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89346 of 2024(3) dt.03-04-2025 2/3 petitioner has no concern with the seized motorcycle or the mobile phone. The petitoiner was also not present at his house on the day and time of alleged occurrence. The petitioner has also no concern with the other accused persons. There is a noncompliance of Section 103 of the B.N.S.S. which creates a serious doubt in the prosecution case. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent and is languishing in judicial custody since 18.10.2024 without any rhymes or reason.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner, stating that huge quantity of arms and ammunition has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and other coaccused persons.

6. Having heard rival contention of both the parties and considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case as also taking into account the period of custody of the petitioner, let the petitioner, abovenamed, be released on bail, after framing of charge if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 460 of 2024, subject to the following conditions;

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89346 of 2024(3) dt.03-04-2025 3/3 (i) One of the bailor(s) shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) rishi/- U T