Dayanand Yadav v. The State Of Bihar,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.498 of 2019 ====================================================== 1.
Dayanand Yadav Son of Rampujan Yadav, Resident of Village- Jaysauli Kharg, P.O.- Jaysauli Pachrukhi, District- Siwan. 2.
Ganesh Ram, Son of Indrajeet Ram, Resident of Village- Satbar, P.O.- Gautam Budh Nagar Tarwara, District- Siwan.
3.
Shivjeet Prasad, Son of Murari Prasad, Resident of Village- Satbar, P.O. - Gautam Budh Nagar Tarwara, District- Siwan.
4.
Sanjay Kumar Kushwaha, Son of Umashankar Prasad, Resident of VillageSatbar, P.O. - Gautam Budh Nagar Tarwara, District- Siwan. 5.
Bindu Devi, W/o Rameshwar Singh, Resident of Village- Chauki hasan, P.O.- Chauki hasan, District- Siwan.
6.
Rambha Devi, W/o Shambhu Ji Yadav, Resident of Village- Tikari Tola Mathiya, P.O.- Sidhwal, District- Siwan.
7.
Shanti Sharma, W/o Devnath Sharma, Resident of Village- Philpura, P.O.- Chaunchora, District- Siwan.
8.
Lal Babu Ram, S/o Bacha Ram, Resident of Village- Jamo Bazar, P.O. Jama Bazar, District- Siwan.
9.
Sunil Kumar Son of Ramanand Prasad, Resident of Village- Bira Tola, P.O. Hatimpur, District- Siwan.
10.
Vinod Kumar Son of Vidhya Sagar Sharam, Resident of Village and P.O.- Hatimpur, District- Siwan.
11.
Rakesh Kumar, Son of Laljee Chaudhary, Resident of Village- Badarjimi, P.O. Kailgarh, District- Siwan.
12.
Sandesh Kumar, Son of Dharamraj Sah, Resident of Village- Aural, P.O. Pakari, District- Siwan.
13.
Sunil Kumar Pandey, Son of late Ramadhar Pandey, Resident of VillageBhanti, P.O. Kachnar, District- Siwan. 14.
Saroj Sinha, W/o Vinay Kumar Sinha, Resident of Village and P.O.- Siyadi Khurd, District- Siwan.
15.
Tunni Kumari Devi, W/o Brij Kishor Tiwari, Resident of Village and P.O. Jagatpur, District- Siwan.
16.
Rajlal Sah, Son of Gulabchand Sah, Resident of Village- Madasara, P.O. Chhoti Tola Madasara, District- Siwan.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Commissioner-Cum-Secretary, Department Human Resources Development Government of Bihar.
3.
The District Magistrate, Distt.- Siwan.
4.
The Deputy Development Commissioner Distt. Siwan.
Patna High Court CWJC No.498 of 2019(2) dt.08-08-2019 2/3 5.
The Education Officer District- Siwan.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Devanand Tiwari For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 08-08-2019 Heard the parties.
The petitioners, in the instant proceedings claim to be Lok Shikshaks. It is submission of the petitioners' counsel that having regard to their long service, they are entitled to age relaxation in the matter of engagement in Government service. He submits that other similarly situated persons had approached this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 1109 of 2017. In the said proceedings, the petitioners have been granted relief as claimed by the petitioners in the instant petition. The petitioners' claim parity in the matter of age relaxation for being considered for engagement in Government service. He has placed reliance on the judgment in the case of Prafull Kumar Mandal and Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar (C.W.J.C. No. 1109 of 2017). The petitioners' counsel submits that the petitioners will also approach the respondent authorities by making a representation for being extended the same benefits.
If the petitioners make the representation within a period of four weeks, then the respondent authorities having
Patna High Court CWJC No.498 of 2019(2) dt.08-08-2019 3/3 regard to all facts, will consider the petitioners' claim for grant of parity and dispose of the same with a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks thereafter.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) s.hassan/- U